Like
many people out there in the gaming space, I like to try to play
games to completion. Though I do that with fewer and fewer games as I
grow older, those games that particularly interest me still fuel that
urge to do everything I can before moving on. Because of this, I am
all too familiar with some of the frustrations that come from such a
playstyle. Open-world RPGs can be either great or horrible for people
like myself. On one hand, we always have something to do, because
those kinds of games will almost always have a quest or two hidden
away for players to find. However, completions like me are never able
to completely move on from them, because those kinds of games will
almost always have a quest or two hidden away for players to find.
Despite this problem, this genre can be implemented in ways that can
either exacerbate this feeling or lessen it in people.
Two
open-world RPGs in particular are the subjects of this weeks article:
Kingdoms of Amalur, which I recently got finished playing, and
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, one of the most successful games
in the Elder Scrolls franchise. I want to talk about these two games
in particular for a very special reason. Both games have tons of
content. So much so that players could spend hundreds of hours
playing either game and still never be able to complete it all.
However, when I think of trying to do everything in Kingdoms of
Amalur, I can't help but be intimidated by the thought. Not because
any one piece of content is particularly overwhelming, but because I
feel that it will take so much time, become so boring, and progress
will be so slow that I just lose any desire to keep playing the game.
At the same time, the thought of exploring the land of Skyrim,
despite all the criticisms I have levied at that game over its
lifespan, fills me with delight. Just writing about it now makes me
want to go back, reload my save, and keep exploring the land to look
for all the things I undoubtedly missed. At this realization, I sat
down and thought for a bit as to why that might be.
The
first explanation I came to for this is that Kingdoms of Amalur makes
the sheer wealth of content available much more obvious than Skyrim
does. When traveling through a given area in Kingdoms of Amalur,
players will often come across bright yellow question marks on the
map. Each of those symbols represents a quest which the players can
stop to complete. This means that a player can gauge exactly how many
quests are in given area by just filling out the map and counting how
many yellow question marks show up. This is in fairly stark contrast
to Skyrim. In the latest installment to the Elder Scrolls series,
players are not explicitly told where or how to find quests. Players
need to talk with people in towns or settlements in order to obtain
quests. While sometimes NPCs in the game world will come up and
petition the player character for assistance, the player themselves
will generally be the one who has to begin interactions in order to
discover new content.
Though
these two systems lead to the same end, in which the player discovers
quests and content to do, they accomplish different things in the
mind of the player. In the case of Kingdoms of Amalur, all the
content is made readily apparent to the player. In Skyrim, the exact
amount of content is obfuscated. So when I go into an new area in
Kingdoms of Amalur, I think to myself that this could be a potential
6-7 hours sitting right here just doing missions completely unrelated
to anything else in the game. Entering a new town in Skryim, I can
complete whatever errands I need to run and talk to a few villagers
to find some quests I need to do. Without the constant reminder that
there is a new thing to do in the city, it is easier for me to trick
myself into thinking that I have “completed” all the quests in
town, when in truth I have barely scratched the surface. Nonetheless,
I walk away with a feeling like I accomplished much. In Kingdoms of
Amalur, when I finish a quest, I feel like it is just a drop in
bucket because I can see another 3-4 quests just in this one grassy
plane. It is a subtle shift in the way it makes players think, but a
key one that affects the perception of the whole game.
Another
contributing factor to the difference in feeling of intimidation in
one of these games, but not the other is that contrast in how combat
works in each of them. In Kingdoms of Amalur, the combat is very
visceral. There is a surprising amount of depth to it. Players need
to stay aware of their surroundings in order to dodge enemy attacks,
while trying to create an opening to stagger the enemy. If they are
not careful, then they themselves will be knocked down and on the
defensive. Each weapon type has its own combo chain, with strength
and speed unique to that type of weapon. Though not difficult, timing
and planning are quite important, and even enemies of equal level can
wear down the unprepared (especially when there are mages in the
enemy formation). On the flip side, Skyrim's combat is quite bare
bones. It is quite trivial to button mash one's way through most
encounters the game will throw at the player. Magic and stealth
characters can use spells and backstab to change things up, but the
mechanics are fairly simple and do not need much knowledge to fully
grasp.
Let me
preface my next statement by saying that I enjoy the combat in
Kingdoms of Amalur. In fact, the combat was one of the most enjoyable
parts of the game. However, that kind of combat against dozens and
dozens of encounters has a way of gradually draining the player's
mental stamina and enthusiasm for playing. As fun and fairly easy as
it is, the sheer number of enemies the game throws at the player are
not quite compatible with the type of combat. Also, the foes in
Kingdoms of Amalur are quite durable, so taking them down can be
fairly time consuming. While Skyrim also tends to have a lot of
enemies come the player's way, the simpler mechanics lend themselves
to that more readily. Enemies tend to fall fast and easy. It is not
as mentally draining to play through waves of enemies in Skyrim than
it in Kingdoms of Amalur, so playing through it is more bearable,
despite its combat being worse overall. As a result, it is much
easier to play hours and hours of Skyrim than in is to do the same in
Kingdoms of Amalur. I can also play the latter for an hour or two
before I feel the need to save and shut it off.
I find
it interesting to compare and contrast similar games, because there
is much to learn from such analysis. Both games are likely in many
ways, but the way they implement their systems can leave completely
different impressions of the audience. What is even more interesting
is that I know there will be people who disagree for many different
reasons. I am sad that Kingdoms of Amalur did not do so well, because
I think they could do so much better if given a second chance.
Hopefully, people will be able to learn from what went wrong with the
game in time. Until then, there will be guys like me out there to
over-analyze games like it in the vain hopes that others will listen.
